Given that there will not appear to be any "Formal" Load Data around for this Load, can a few of you offer a starting point with this combination and issues to consider when working this Load up?
H4831 will function in the Swift but not true well. You are going to in no way get the pressures you would like for consistency with the .223. 760, or H414 will be far better but for many cause I ain't the biggest admirer of most ball powders.
The fact that the H4831 is indeed a slower burning powder is specifically why you are seeing greater velocities obtained with that powder, rather than That which you've witnessed with the IMR stuff. Also great powder, but rather better suited to somewhat scaled-down conditions by using a bit less capability.
Sweet!! I'll decide some up and provides it a check out. Thank you fellas, I value it! I'll Permit you to know very well what I find out. I do have about a fifty percent pound of 4350 I'm able to try out that initial and see what takes place.
Newbie to reloading. This will likely be useful for a 300wsm with 215 bergers. I used to be capable of get my fingers on a pair kilos of h4831.
WARNING: This product or service can expose you to Lead, which is understood into the Condition of California to result in most cancers and beginning defects or other reproductive hurt. To find out more go to – .
NBTs or Hornady VMax, but Have got a limited provide h4831sc of Varget, plus a ton more available H4831SC. I shoot 55 gr. loads Nearly exclusively, due to the fact that is definitely just what the rifles shoot the very best.
excaliber stated: I have identified the exact reverse being legitimate in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with one hundred eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably faster and equally accurate powder in my three hundred Get Mag.
Currently applying IMR 4831 in a very 300WSM, and see the H4831sc is a well-liked option for this caliber and yields a little more velocity. Aside from it becoming short cut, what on earth is the real difference in these two h4831sc powders, and will I switch to H4831sc?
[electronic mail guarded] gn and 115 CT's, I have killed much more Deer using this combo than every one of the rifles I have put together, Function as many as this h4831sc although the sweet location is going to be all-around 54, I am a Two Bit-06 nut and I've some things tat functions very well for me In case your interested
I required somewhat extra myself so I went ahead and grabbed the 8lb jug to be covered for a while (and have lots of the identical great deal of powder).
It's been a little bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Found a node and shot some teams. I shot a .6 5 shot team currently. It is really slightly slower than H1000, but shoots great. Many thanks for the recommendation, It can be very good to realize that I have received options when a person or the opposite powder is dried up.
You could either: one) Go on and possess the objects shown under instantly removed from your shopping cart:
I sawed 1 in 50 % to see how thick the jackets had been, and so they have been quickly 2 times as thick to be a fifty-grain hollow issue was. Ditto for the 64-grain Power Stage, as these bullets are developed for deer, not prairie puppies or woodchucks. You now know almost everything I find out about the 22-250 and sluggish-burning powders, and I don't know everything in any way about the 223. I question that you are going to get any place with that cartridge and 4831, but allow us to understand how it goes.